壹生大学

壹生身份认证协议书

本项目是由壹生提供的专业性学术分享,仅面向医疗卫生专业人士。我们将收集您是否是医疗卫生专业人士的信息,仅用于资格认证,不会用于其他用途。壹生作为平台及平台数据的运营者和负责方,负责平台和本专区及用户相关信息搜集和使用的合规和保护。
本协议书仅为了向您说明个人相关信息处理目的,向您单独征求的同意,您已签署的壹生平台《壹生用户服务协议》和《壹生隐私政策》,详见链接:
壹生用户服务协议:
https://apps.medtrib.cn/html/serviceAgreement.html
壹生隐私政策:
https://apps.medtrib.cn/html/p.html
如果您是医疗卫生专业人士,且点击了“同意”,表明您作为壹生的注册用户已授权壹生平台收集您是否是医疗卫生专业人士的信息,可以使用本项服务。
如果您不是医疗卫生专业人士或不同意本说明,请勿点击“同意”,因为本项服务仅面向医疗卫生人士,以及专业性、合规性要求等因素,您将无法使用本项服务。

同意

拒绝

同意

拒绝

知情同意书

同意

不同意并跳过

工作人员正在审核中,
请您耐心等待
审核未通过
重新提交
完善信息
{{ item.question }}
确定
收集问题
{{ item.question }}
确定
您已通过HCP身份认证和信息审核
(
5
s)

常见血管性认知障碍小鼠模型中不同的脑缺血和空间认知障碍模式

2022-08-03作者:论坛报沐雨资讯
脑血管病非原创

image.png


Stroke & Vascular Neurology(SVN)最新上线文章“Deeper cerebral hypoperfusion leads to spatial cognitive impairment in mice”,来自复旦大学附属中山医院神经内科汪昕教授、丁晶教授团队。


血管性认知障碍(Vascular cognitive impairment, VCI)是全球痴呆的第二大病因,由脑血管疾病或相关危险因素引起。然而,目前尚没有合适的动物模型可用于研究人类VCI的神经病理学变化。为了更好地了解VCI的发展,作者团队对3种慢性血管性疾病的小鼠模型进行了修饰,并进一步比较了这些模型的优缺点,有望建立一个更适合的模拟人类VCI的小鼠模型。


作者团队使用成年雄性C57/BL6小鼠(n=98),分别施以短暂性双侧颈总动脉闭塞(tBCCAO)或双侧颈总动脉狭窄(BCAS)或右侧单侧颈总动脉闭塞。在4周内检查表面脑血流(CBF)的血流动力学变化,评估空间认知障碍以明确慢性脑缺血的结果。


研究结果显示,与对照组相较,这些小鼠模型在术后1~4周显示出不同程度的CBF降低和空间参考记忆障碍(p<0.05)。作者团队发现:(1)短暂性双侧颈总动脉闭塞导致C57/BL6小鼠CBF下降90%(p<0.05),并引起急性而非长期的空间参考记忆障碍(p<0.05);(2)单侧颈总动脉闭塞引起小鼠严重的同侧缺血,产生轻微但显著的空间参考记忆障碍(p<0.05);(3)双侧颈动脉狭窄模型中,长期的CBF下降20%不会引起术后4周的空间参考记忆障碍(p>0.05),而双侧或单侧CBF下降30%可导致小鼠显著记忆障碍(p<0.05)。


微信图片_20220715100612.jpg

Figure 1CBF changes and mortalities of BCAS models (A) Schematic representation of BCAS operation (grouping by different inner diameters of the microcoils). (B) Representation of laser speckle contrast image on BCAS model subgroups at preoperation, 2 hours postoperation, and 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks postoperation. (C–E) Numerical representation of CBF changes measured by laser Doppler flowmetry at preoperation, 2 hours postoperation, and 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks postoperation. (C) The 0.16 mm subgroup of the BCAS model. (D) The 0.16/0.18 mm subgroup of the BCAS model. (E) The 0.18 mm subgroup of the BCAS model. n=5/group. (F) The mortality of different subgroups. All data were represented as mean±SEM. ***P<0.001. BCAS, bilateral common carotid artery stenosis; CBF, cerebral blood flow.


微信图片_20220715100640.jpg

Figure 2. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes and mortalities of right unilateral common carotid artery occlusion (rUCCAO) and transient bilateral common carotid arteries occlusion (tBCCAO) models (A) Schematic representation of tBCCAO and rUCCAO operation. (B) Representation of laser speckle contrast image of rUCCAO and tBCCAO models at preoperation, 2 hours postoperation (rUCCAO)/immediately postoperation (tBCCAO), and 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks postoperation. (C–D) Numerical representation of CBF changes measured by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) at preoperation, 2 hours postoperation (rUCCAO)/immediately postoperation (tBCCAO), and 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks postoperation. n=5/group. (C) rUCCAO. (D) tBCCAO. (E) Mortalities of tBCCAO and rUCCAO operation. All data were represented as mean±SEM. ns indicated not significant.


image.png

Figure 3. Test of spatial reference memory and motor ability deficiency of BCAS model subgroups (A) Morris water maze (MWM) acquisition period for subgroups of the BCAS model from the starting day 1 to day 5 of the test. (B) MWM probe test on day 6. (C) Times of each mouse swimming across the platform area in probe test. (D) Times of each mouse swimming across the platform area in probe test. (E) Average swimming speed of each group on day 6. All groups were compared with the control group. All data were represented as mean±SEM. ns indicated not significant; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; **p<0.001. 0.16 mm subgroup (n=7); 0.16/0.18 mm subgroup (n=10); 0.18 mm subgroup (n=11); control group (n=12). BCAS, bilateral common carotid artery stenosis.


image.png

Figure 4. Test of spatial reference memory and motor ability deficiency of right unilateral common carotid artery occlusion (rUCCAO) and transient bilateral common carotid arteries occlusion (tBCCAO) models. (A) Morris water maze (MWM) acquisition period for tBCCAO at 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after operation from day 1 to day 5. (B) MWM probe test on day 6. The time each mouse swimming in the quadrant including the platform area. (C) The time each mouse swimming across the platform area in probe test. (D) Average swimming speed of each group on day 6. All data were represented as mean±SEM. All groups were compared with the control group. NS indicated not significant; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. tBCCAO 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks group (n=11/group); rUCCAO group (n=12); control group (n=13).


研究结论:在研究VCI的机制和发展治疗方法时,作者团队证明了使用0.16/0.18 mm微线圈的BCAS可作为一种替代的VCI小鼠模型。


微信图片_20210303180055.jpg

来源:SVN俱乐部

转载已获授权,其他账号转载请联系原账号

相关链接

JAMA:服用新型口服抗凝剂患者的静脉溶栓治疗


罕见病诊疗指南——全身型重症肌无力


罕见病诊疗指南——天使综合征【神经系统罕见病】


丁晶教授:伴癫痫的脑梗死,溶栓治疗怎么考虑?


脑梗早期头颅CT征象:大脑中动脉高密度征


神经领域6月热文Top10,一键了解!


神经领域5月热文Top10,一键了解!


神经领域4月热文Top10,一键了解!


【附下载】中国颅内动脉瘤影像学判读专家共识


血栓预防及血栓形成的治疗推荐丨2022 AHA/ASA自发性脑出血患者管理指南


指南共识 | 特发性正常压力脑积水临床管理中国指南(2022)


比较利伐沙班和阿哌沙班的最大最新证据


肌张力障碍诊断中国专家共识


脑出血发病机制的诊断评估丨2022 AHA/ASA自发性脑出血患者管理指南


神经影像征象识别之——“池征”


颅脑解剖及血管性病变的MRI诊断,这篇文章讲全了!


心源性卒中,如何恢复抗凝?


二级预防及一级预防推荐丨2022 AHA/ASA自发性脑出血患者管理指南


200 评论

查看更多